Until Nathan. The prophet maintained an adversarial relationship with the king, even as he held the king’s good opinion. This was something of an oddity; everyone else who opposed the king, even in the slightest, usually ended up dead. But the prophet entered the throne room without so much as a quiver and, with a pointed (and not so subtle) parable, condemned the king.
Immediately King David’s supporters in the room stood up and raised their consternation exclaiming, “King David is our king, not our high priest. His moral qualities have no bearing on the effectiveness of his rule.”
“And besides,” they added in a loud voice, “what about her e-mails!?”
(2 Samuel 11 – 12)
I am British but from what I see of the kind of people calling themselves Christian leaders
ReplyDeleteTrump socialises with I doubt if he would ever get to meet one as honest as nathan.