It's not a personalized letter, of course. I didn't really expect that it would be. He's a busy man, and I'm sure that he receives far more correspondence than I can imagine. Yet someone on his staff has prepared this form letter in response to my letter and my questions, and the letters and questions of others like me.
This is the letter I received:
Dear Jeff:
Thank you for
writing. I have heard from many Americans about our Nation’s foreign
policy, and I appreciate your perspective.
As President, my highest priority is the safety of the American people. My Administration is using every element of our national power to keep our country secure, prosperous, and free. We have renewed our leadership in the world by strengthening old alliances and forging new partnerships to meet common challenges—from preventing terrorist attacks, reversing the global economic crisis, and responding to pandemic disease to confronting climate change, preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, and providing relief from natural crises.
As President, my highest priority is the safety of the American people. My Administration is using every element of our national power to keep our country secure, prosperous, and free. We have renewed our leadership in the world by strengthening old alliances and forging new partnerships to meet common challenges—from preventing terrorist attacks, reversing the global economic crisis, and responding to pandemic disease to confronting climate change, preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, and providing relief from natural crises.
After more than a
decade of sacrifice, the tide of war is finally turning. The war in Iraq
is over. The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and
more will soon be coming home. In Afghanistan, we have begun a transition
to Afghan responsibility for security, and we have a clear path to fulfill our
mission. That is why, on May 2, 2012, I signed a historic Strategic
Partnership Agreement between the United States and Afghanistan which defines a
new relationship between our countries as the war comes to an end. As in
Iraq, we are building an enduring partnership to strengthen Afghan sovereignty
and stability while advancing our shared goal of delivering justice to
al-Qa’ida and contributing to the security of the region. We have
devastated al-Qa’ida’s leadership—taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders,
including Osama bin Laden. The goal I set to defeat al-Qa’ida and deny it
the chance to rebuild is now within our reach.
The courage and
sacrifice of our men and women in uniform has promoted peace and prosperity
from Germany to Korea and enabled democracy to take hold in places like Libya.
Our commitment to global security will never waver, but in a world in which
threats are more diffuse and missions are more complex, America cannot act
alone. We will continue to align our policies with those with whom we
share common values and interests. That is why NATO remains indispensable
to our security. At the NATO Summit I hosted in May 2012, we took steps to
ensure the Alliance has the capabilities it needs to meet 21st-century
threats. At the same time, we must also strengthen the United Nations and
regional peacekeeping capabilities.
America will
remain committed to governments that reflect the will of their people. I
have an unyielding belief that all people share some basic aspirations:
to support our families, to maintain the freedom to choose our leaders, to
worship as we please, and to live in peace and security. These are not
just American ideas; they are human rights—and we will support them
everywhere. I know the challenges faced by the international community
can be met if we commit ourselves to a sustained effort to secure the universal
human rights of freedom and dignity for all our children.
To learn more about our foreign policy, please visitwww.WhiteHouse.gov/Issues/Foreign-Policy.
To learn more about our foreign policy, please visitwww.WhiteHouse.gov/Issues/Foreign-Policy.
Thank you, again, for writing.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama
In this letter all the standard talking points are repeated: turning the tide of war... keeping our country secure, prosperous and free... etc. etc. etc...
But it was those words towards the end of the letter that grabbed me: "I have an unyielding belief that all people share some basic aspirations: to support our families, to maintain the freedom to choose our leaders, to worship as we please, and to live in peace and security. These are not just American ideas; they are human rights - and we will support them everywhere."
I would like to believe that the President believes this. And, in fact, I do believe that he does -but - how much can those beliefs matter when our national policies still embrace the use of unmanned attack drones - against foreign combatants and even against U.S. citizens? I have wonder how much the President is being guided by those beliefs (or else I will have to become as cynical as some already believe me to be, and say that President Obama doesn't really believe these things...)
These "terror drones" are used to attack and kill individuals declared to be enemies - without warning, without arrest, without trial. They kill from a distance, at the push of a button. They are not quite the precision instruments that we are told - as they often kill and wound civilians and non-combatants instead of or in addition to their intended targets.
These "terror drones" do not lead to increased security around the world, but are generating intense hatred for the United States and for the governments of countries that allow us to use them in their territories. We are not winning a war against terrorism - we are creating more enemies.
We cannot win a war against terrorism by using terror ourselves.
Repeating the talking point that "we are turning the tide of war" isn't going to be enough. We need to stop being the terrorists. We need to stop using unmanned attack drones.
But it was those words towards the end of the letter that grabbed me: "I have an unyielding belief that all people share some basic aspirations: to support our families, to maintain the freedom to choose our leaders, to worship as we please, and to live in peace and security. These are not just American ideas; they are human rights - and we will support them everywhere."
I would like to believe that the President believes this. And, in fact, I do believe that he does -but - how much can those beliefs matter when our national policies still embrace the use of unmanned attack drones - against foreign combatants and even against U.S. citizens? I have wonder how much the President is being guided by those beliefs (or else I will have to become as cynical as some already believe me to be, and say that President Obama doesn't really believe these things...)
These "terror drones" are used to attack and kill individuals declared to be enemies - without warning, without arrest, without trial. They kill from a distance, at the push of a button. They are not quite the precision instruments that we are told - as they often kill and wound civilians and non-combatants instead of or in addition to their intended targets.
These "terror drones" do not lead to increased security around the world, but are generating intense hatred for the United States and for the governments of countries that allow us to use them in their territories. We are not winning a war against terrorism - we are creating more enemies.
We cannot win a war against terrorism by using terror ourselves.
Repeating the talking point that "we are turning the tide of war" isn't going to be enough. We need to stop being the terrorists. We need to stop using unmanned attack drones.
No comments:
Post a Comment