Pages

google analytics

Showing posts with label Gnosticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gnosticism. Show all posts

Sunday, May 1, 2016

Biblioblog Carnival April 2016


Greetings and Salutations! Welcome to the Biblioblog Carnival roundup for April 2016 - a collection of blog posts, videos, podcasts and tweets relevant to the broad field of biblical studies posted last month. These may not have been the BEST of ALL possible blog posts, videos, podcasts and tweets, but they are ones that caught my eye and captured my interest. I've hosted the biblioblog in the past, and now as then, I've utilized a more-is-more, throw the spaghetti against the wall and see what sticks kind of approach. Jim West at Zwinglius Redivivus will, no doubt, be much more selective in his own version of the Carnival.



Sweaty Old Testamenty Stuff

*Marlowe at Carpe Scriptura spent some time reconsidering Amos’s “Rhetoric of Entrapment."

It seems as though God’s voice – the lion’s roar – may be a much more central theme in the book than I had initially thought. The cutting of the lines of communication comes up again and again as both Israel and God do it. It is this cutting of contact that warrants Israel’s punishment, and it is also the punishment itself. Amos’s role as intercessor in Amos 7 becomes so much more important, because it is through the prophets that Israel might “seek the Lord and live. As we move through the book, we find that God’s voice is linked to sin, punishment, and even salvation.
You might as well be writing feminist interpretations of an Ikea assembly manual if you’re going to publish astrophysical papers on the Psalms.

*Dr. Bruce Wells at the ASOR blog spoke about Sex Crimes in the Hebrew Bible.



*Christopher Rollston posted the first of a series of articles on gender-based violence in the bible:  Jacob’s Daughter Dinah.

… although in the recent past (e.g., just a few decades ago) violence against women was not the subject of international attention or concern, it has now “come to be recognized as a legitimate human rights issue and as a significant threat to women’s health and well-being.” The fact that there is now much more focus on gender-based violence is such a good thing, so right, so important. Of course, the witness of Scripture (and this is one of the reasons for recounting Dinah’s story here) is that gender-based violence is a very old problem.

*Deane at Remnant of Giants shared a post about literacy rates in ancient Judah: Judah’s Military Correspondence From ca. 600 BCE: Evidence of Widespread Literacy but not Evidence of the Bible 

The strength of the article lies in its identification of the extent of literacy in far-flung reaches of Judea, among various ranking members of the military and military administration. It would be not too rash to say that, given the literacy levels in the military establishment, we would expect that scribal literacy would be competent to produce more literary works of the forms which we find in the Hebrew Bible/Tanach. Indeed, the Tell Deir ‘Alla plaster inscription, written in a Hebrew dialect and located bang in the middle of Israelite territory during the period of its hegemony in the region, dates some two centuries before this. So scribes would be capable of the literary forms found in the Hebrew Bible. This doesn’t really tell us about the general literacy in the wider population, as the article implies it does. But more important is the question of literacy among the elites, which the article provides reasonable evidence for.

*And, if you'll forgive me, one of my own Biblical Limericks: That's Certainly Coitus Interrupted

Apocryphal, Pseudographical, Intertestamental and other Weirdo Type Stuff


*James Hamrick at The Ancient Bookshelf  has a reading/vocabulary guide for Ethiopic Jubilees available for you to download. Ethiopic Jubilees Reading Guide: The Creation, Part 1 

*Presidential Candidate Donald Trump told us his favorite bible verse.

*Ancient-Reformed Worship spoke to Hughes Oliphant about the Odes of Solomon

The Odes cast a spell. Something beautiful is happening here. It has a literary integrity I think that’s very important. The Odes are very unusual in the different imagery that they come up with. But that imagery is used again and again. One place where the Odes seem to have mined this imagery is the Book of Psalms. And Rendel Harris, the great scholar who really brought the Odes to the attention of the modern world, refers to these Odes as Psalm pendants. It’s as though the congregation might have sung a particular Psalm, and then, the Odes would’ve been sung as a response to it. And so many of the Odes when one reads through them one realizes that the imagery of Psalm 45 is being used or Psalm 63 is being used. And that’s one of the beautiful things about these Odes is that they’re so close to scripture.

*The Biblical Review reviewed the Testament of Moses 

Although the Testament of Moses is cut off half-way through the manuscript, it is nonetheless helpful in reconstructing ideologies and worldviews from the Levant in the 1st century C.E., and even earlier if we assume the text had previous written and oral traditions preceding it’s composition. The testament claims to be “the prophecy which was made by Moses in the book of Deuteronomy”; however, while it takes up a similar tone, the testament incorporates material relevant to the Maccabean Period, indicative of the late date of the text.


Based on the previous information, it is evident that we should read the Testament of Moses as its own piece of literary work, self-sustaining and independent. What we will consider today is Moses’ role as a divinator in the Testament of Moses.

*I'm sorry. I can't help myself. It's compulsive- Biblical Limericks: The Nothingness of  a Man

New Intestines


*James McGrath is trying to find a balance between naive credulity and extreme skepticism with respect to the Gospels and other early Christian sources in description of Jesus’ death in Philippians 2: 6 – 11. Philippians 2 and the Historical Jesus

It is striking to turn in light of this to Philippians 2:6-11. If Paul is there quoting a hymn, then this might be our earliest source of information about the death of Jesus, as well as about how Christians understood it. In that passage, Jesus’ death is nothing else but the culmination of his obedience, leading to his exaltation.

*Richard Beck at Experimental Theology wrote about the tragedy in violence- Put Away the Sword: Tragedy and Eschatology 

That's what upsets me about crowds cheering and thrilling to calls to bomb ISIS, so-called "Christians" who are viewing violence triumphalistically rather than tragically. Because Jesus said "put your sword away" Christians can never cheer violence. We must only grieve it.

*Scott McKnight at Jesus Creed  wrote about the Messianic Divine Secret of Jesus in the gospel of Mark.

...if Jesus silenced confession of him as Messiah how much more would have silenced for strategical reasons any suggestions of his deity. I find the logic solid, if not compelling.

*Phil Long at Reading Acts has been working his way though the Apocalypse of John  – Heavenly Throne Rooms in Apocalyptic Literature 

Revelation 4-5 is built first on the foundation of the Hebrew Bible. There are several texts which describe God as enthroned, such as Isaiah 6 and Ezekiel 1-2. In both of these passages the prophet sees a vision of God enthroned in heaven surrounded by otherworldly angelic creatures (seraphim in Isaiah, cherubim in Ezekiel). In both cases the prophet is stunned by the vision and eventually commissioned to a prophetic office. In Revelation 4 there is a central throne, angelic beings, but John is not a prophet as much as an observer of the impending judgment contained in the scroll given to the Lamb to open.

*Dustin R. Smith at The Dustin Martyr Blog attended the “Did Jesus Exist” debate between Craig Evans and Richard Carrier: 

I had the privilege of attending last night’s debate on “Did Jesus Exist?” between two well-versed debaters – Dr. Craig Evans and Dr. Richard Carrier. When I learned of this debate, I wanted to take advantage of listening to Carrier, who is probably the world’s foremost mythicist scholar. In other words, I felt that this debate would expose me to the best arguments scholars could put forth suggesting Jesus was simply made up in history. Now I took plenty of apologetic classes in my undergraduate and graduate studies to become convinced of the overwhelming evidence regarding Jesus’ existence, but I could not pass up the chance to listen to Richard Carrier live. So I piled up my car with a few of my bright students and we took off to witness the debate. Here are some of my observations of last night’s event:

*Pete Enns thinks that Paul was just “winging it.” 

I know that might not seem very reverent, especially since Romans is often thought of as the primo example of Paul at his difficult yet nevertheless logically consistent best, where he once and for all lays out the basics of the gospel for all to hear and for all time. Not that Romans is a jumbled mess—may it never be (see what I did there?)—but to me Romans reads more like Paul is in creative-problem-solving mode for Roman Christians facing a pressing problem (how Jews and Gentiles make up one people of God) than Paul sitting in his study writing a theological treatise intended for wider publication.

*Biblical Studies Online shared two lectures from David Noel Freedman: “Jesus as a Disciple”  (April 23, 1993)  a
nd “The Role of Human Beings in the Bible” (April 20, 1993) 



*Ronald V. Huggins  refuted the idea that Judas didn’t actually exist: Did Judas Exist? A Friendly Critique of Dennis R. MacDonald's Easter Time Blog  

*I need help. I know it: Biblical Limericks: The Four Horsemen

Gnostical

*James McGrath at Exploring our Matrix  appeared on the online talk show: Talk Gnosis to speak about the historical Jesus and mythicism. 




*Jesus Facepalmed -Part 2 of James McGrath’s Conversation with Talk Gnosis at Gnostic Wisdom-

Is there a vast international conspiracy to convince you that Jesus was a real person? Well, not really. It’s a game of probabilities. Scholars say that, given the evidence we have, it’s more likely than not that there was an actual dude named Jesus walking around in the desert 2000 years ago. Of course, you are free to draw your own conclusions, and a belief in Gnosticism certainly does not need to include a belief in a historical Jesus.

Ecclesial Churchy Stuff

*Alexandria at Women in Theology wrote about masculine vs feminine church in Between the Binary: Is “Effeminacy”Really an Issue in Evangelical Church Culture?

Too often, Christian writers and commentators assume (or do not question) an equivalency between femininity and the female; therefore, the mere presence of female bodies within a church’s congregation is believed to engender an effeminate style of Christianity. Evangelicalism’s enduring phobia of “liberal” feminism is largely to blame, and has made its members ignorant of even the most innocuous principles of basic gender theory: namely, that there is a distinction between biological sex and gender identity, that humans are responsible for creating culturally contingent gender roles (not God), and that both men and women hardly ever conform completely to their prescribed roles.


*Pope Francis released an apostolic exhortation entitled Amoris Laetitia, Latin for “The Joy of Love.” You can read the whole 256 page document here.

If you are heterosexual, married, divorced, and remarried with an understanding parish priest, you have reason to be hopeful that your “irregular situation” can be fixed. If you use most forms of effective birth control, have an abortion, or are a sexually active LGBTIQ Catholic, you might as well read Dante and/or seek another denomination if you expect to be treated with equality, dignity, and respect. ... The “Joy Love Club” is members-only.

*Members of a recent Vatican council have called for Pope Francis to reject the “Just War” theory and to issue and encyclical on nonviolence 

Too often the 'just war theory' has been used to endorse rather than prevent or limit war," they continue. "Suggesting that a 'just war' is possible also undermines the moral imperative to develop tools and capacities for nonviolent transformation of conflict…We need a new framework that is consistent with Gospel nonviolence," say the participants, noting that Francis and his four predecessors have all spoken out against war often. "We propose that the Catholic Church develop and consider shifting to a Just Peace approach based on Gospel nonviolence.


Of course, even if Christians did engage in contextualization—expressing their message and worship in the language or forms of the local people—that in no way implies doctrinal compromise. Christians around the world have sought to redeem the local culture for Christ while purging it of practices antithetical to biblical norms. After all, Christians speak of "Good Friday," but they are in no way honoring the worship of the Norse/Germanic queen of the gods Freya by doing so.


But, in fact, in the case of Easter the evidence suggests otherwise: that neither the commemoration of Christ's death and resurrection nor its name are derived from paganism.

*Joel Watts at Unsettled Christianity wrote about the time that Lucifer split the church by refusing grace.



Philosofical, Theologicalic Things

*The good folks at Jesus Jazz and Buddhism think that Everything We See is Past  and they have diagrams and videos about Process Theology, Alfred Whitehead and light cones. 



*Joseph P. Laycock at The Conversation  looked at Why So Many Americans Think They’re #Blessed

Today, America seems divided between those who engage with some version of the prosperity gospel and those who smugly dismiss it as fraudulent and puerile. While there are a number of problems with the gospel, it’s important to look at why this strand of religious thinking evolved in the first place, and why it persists.


I believe salvation is not from hell but to good works (Eph. 2.8-10). Salvation is not a momentary conversion, but a process of ontological importance. It is found in the Creed, but never defined. However, Protestantism usually sees it in terms of avoidance of hell. You’ll here mentioned “we deserved hell” and “we aren’t worthy.” Yet, Scripture never declares these things as well as the Reformers did. For Scripture, and Orthodoxy (and Wesleyanism), Salvation begins with the love of God, ending in the positive, rather than the negative.

Archaeologicists

*James Tabor at the Tabor Blog explored the deepening mystery of The Abba Cave, Crucifixion Nails, and the Last Hasmonean King.

It was assumed back in the 1970s that these bones were buried and no longer available for analysis–but it turns out this is not the case. What is even more intriguing, the victim was arguably none other than Matitiyahu Antigonus–the last of the Hashmonean kings–who was both beheaded and crucified by Marc Anthony. in 37 BCE. And even more significant, Greg Doudna has persuasively argued that this Antigonus is none other than the famed “Teacher of Righteousness” in the Dead Sea Scrolls,

*Archaeology News Network - Reported that construction workers in Gaza have discovered ancient ruins that archaeologists say may be part of a Byzantine church dating from around 1,500 years ago, The findings include segments of marble pillars with ornate Corinthian capitals, one nearly three meters (yards) long, and a 90 cm (35 inch) foundation stone bearing a Greek symbol for Christ. Fifteen pieces have been uncovered, with excavations continuing.


According to Dina Avshalom-Gorni, the project’s chief archaeologist on behalf of the IAA, “the incense shovel that was found is one of ten others that are known in the country from the Second Temple period. From early research in the world it was thought that the incense shovel was only used for ritual purposes, to care for the embers and incense that were burnt in ritual ceremonies. Over the years, after incense shovels were discovered in a non-cultic context, it appears they were also used as tools for daily tasks. The incense shovel and jug found in our excavation were exposed lying next to each other on the floor in one of the rooms, at the late Second Temple period storehouses that is located adjacent to the dock of the large Jewish settlement, on the shore of Sea of ​​Galilee. These implements might have been saved in the storeroom as heirlooms by a Jewish family living at Migdal, or they may have been used for daily work as well.”



Edumacational


Given that I have sat on both sides of the interview table–as both candidate looking for a post, and as President or Academic Dean looking to fill a post–I thought I might offer a few reflections on the interview process.  In particular, I want to help candidates know what we are really looking for in a potential professor. I say “really” because I think candidates often misunderstand what we are looking for. And, due to that misunderstanding, sometimes candidates are simply heading down an unhelpful path in the interview process.And when I say “we” I am thinking particularly of those leaders in the world of evangelical seminaries.  Those in university settings, or those who are not evangelical, are unlikely to offer the same advice.

*Larry Hurdato explains Scrolls and the Early Codex 



*Biblical Studies Online shared an interview with ProfessorStavrakopoulou (University of Exeter) who explains why a lot of what’s in the Bible isn’t real, but why she loves it anyway.




Movie Reviews, Book Reports, and Musical Events

*Neil Carter (no relation, so far as I know) at Godless in Dixie  wrote about the Evangelical Christian desire – need- to be persecuted and the film God's Not Dead 2 - Persecute Me, Please: God’s Not Dead 2 and the Evangelical Lust for Victimhood

It’s like they’re ripping off the plot of Miracle on 34th Street. Only this time, it’s set in Arkansas at the state capitol. And instead of trying to establish whether or not Santa Claus is real, now they are trying to determine if Jesus was real. Because that would totally happen in real life in a court of law. And it’s totally relevant to the case at hand.

*James McGrath rather likes Daniel Kirk’s New Book – A Man Attested By God 

This may be the most important book in Christology to appear in recent years. Written in an era when it has become increasingly popular to insist that Jesus is already depicted as a pre-existent figure in the Synoptic Gospels, one who is absorbed into the “divine identity,” Daniel Kirk makes a persuasive case for viewing the depiction of Jesus in Matthew, Mark, and Luke as one of idealized humanity. Unlike many other proposals, this category, and this volume in which it is proposed, does good justice to the evidence, and is likely to stand the test of time.

*Ben Witherington at the Bible and Culture reviewed Richard Hay’s new book: “Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels.”

And even when the NT writers were transforming the OT text in creative ways, for example as Paul does in Gal. 4, these improvisations presuppose a stable text to which one can return again and again, and use in a variety of ways. I would use the analogy of say John Coltrane’s famous version of the Sound of Music song ‘My Favorite Things’. ‘Trane was not trying to faithfully ‘exegete’ that song, he was rather using it as a taking off point for a creative improvisation, but at the same time he was well aware of what playing the tune straight amounted to and sounded like, and he presupposed that his audience did as well (they could look at a copy of the original sheet music or put on the recording of the Sound of Music), so they could appreciate where he was, so to speak, playing outside the lines on the staff paper. I think, in other words, that figural interpretation was only one of the tools in the hermeneutical toolbox of the Gospel writers, and it was not one they always used, certainly not to the exclusion of other ways of using the OT.

*James McGrath also shared A Service of Sacred Music and Rock Prayers 

I am not trying to make the case that no music is sacred. On the contrary, I am more inclined to make the opposite case and argue that all music is sacred. Music takes vibrations in the physical world and combines them in ways that we perceive as beautiful. And so music by definition points towards transcendence, towards the fact that there is more to life that what one perspective can do justice to. And since music is a pointer towards God, it makes sense to use music – any music – as an opportunity to talk about one’s faith and the things that are important to us.

*
Knockin' on Heaven's Door: Bob Dylan and the Gospel - An evening of Gospel and music following the Jewish carpenter who renounced his father's name to sing the blues out on Highway 61.





Ruben Zimmermann’s Puzzling the Parables of Jesus: Methods and Interpretations is a very fine work. One value of the book is that it consciously seeks to bring together current German and American research on the parables. Another important feature is that Zimmermann applies recent research on historiography and memory to the interpretation of the parables. This post will highlight a third contribution of the book, namely Zimmermann’s perceptive discussion of the genre of parable and his convincing suggestion that there are, in fact, parables in John.


In Memoriam 

*Activist Priest and Vietnam Protester Daniel Berrigan Dies at 94

“Dan was one of the great Catholics of our time, a champion of social justice and a tireless promoter of peace…His influence on the peace movement, particularly during the Vietnam War, cannot be overstated, but his aim was not simply peace in Indochina, but peace everywhere.” Berrigan was one of seven Catholic priests who used napalm to burn draft cards in 1968 in protest against the Vietnam War, according to the National Catholic Reporter. As a result, he was sentenced to three years in prison.



*Poet and Prophet 

A literary giant in his own right, Berrigan was best known for his dramatic acts of civil disobedience against the Vietnam War and nuclear weapons. He burned draft files with homemade napalm and later hammered on nuclear weapons to enact the Isaiah prophecy to “beat swords into plowshares.” His actions challenged Americans and Catholics to reexamine their relationship with the state and reject militarism. He constantly asked himself and others: What does the Gospel demand of us?



Future Carnivals

The next several carnivals will be hosted by:

May 2016 (June 1) – Brian Renshaw, @renshaw330
June 2016 (July 1) – Kris Lyle at Old School Script, @KristopherLyle

After that there's nothing - unless you act now. Phil Long at Reading Acts, who organizes these events, would love for you to volunteer as host for upcoming biblioblog carnivals. Contact him  PLEASE! (via Twitter @plong42 ) if you're interested.
















Tuesday, June 2, 2015

God’s Kid Brother: Punk Rock and Gnostic Theology


I have a great many, varied interests. Sometimes people say that I am “well read,” more often they just say I’m “weird.” There are times when having a broad spectrum of interest provides an interesting overlap–like when you find first century gnostic theology bouncing around inside the music of a satirical punk band from the late 80s/early 90s.

Weird, I know.

The Dead Milkmen, a punk band from Philadelphia, has been a favorite of mine ever since I heard the song “Punk Rock Girl” from their 1988 album Beelzebubba (a title that STILL delights me) on a late night college radio program when I was in junior high. They were irreverent. They were funny. Maybe they weren’t the greatest musicians; maybe Joe Genearo’s singing was nasally and often out of key. So what? They were loud and goofy. 

In 1992 I bought their album Soul Rotation (on cassette) and discovered the song “God’s Kid Brother.” I didn’t know it then, and I don’t know if the members of The Dead Milkmen knew it–maybe they thought of it as I did then, as a humorously mild sort of blasphemy, a rejection of the standard biblical creation story in search of an explanation for the apparent dysfunctions of the universe–but the lyrics of the song are very much in line with some of the theology of first century Gnostics.

I've looked for the reason why we're here
I've kept on searching until it was clear
I've looked for excuses - can't find no other
We must be the product of God's kid brother

It’s difficult to describe Gnostic theology, because really it’s more like Gnostic theologies-plural; there were lots of variations, but most of the various gnostic groups believed that that physical world was created by the Demiurge–a sort of lesser deity. In some of the stories the Demiurge is described as cruel and malicious. In these accounts the physical world was created as a sort of trap or prison for pure spiritual beings. In other gnostic writings, the Demiurge is described not as demonic, but foolish and weak. 

Maybe there are two Gods
A perfect God who made all those perfect people
And another God who made the rest of us
And maybe, just maybe, somewhere there's a Heavenly choir
That sings off key.

It’s not exactly spot on. In Gnostic teaching the physical world was not created by God (not even the creation of “all those perfect people.” The perfect God was pure spirit, unsullied by physical matter. And the Demiurge wasn’t “God’s kid brother”–the exact relationship is difficult to describe. But for an irreverent, satirical punk rock song, it’s pretty close.

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

A Limerick for Cerinthus


Gnostic Cerinthus went to be bathed.
John the Apostle fled, still unswathed,
shouting, “Let’s flee! The roof,
on the foe of God’s truth,
is likely to fall, and we’ll be scathed!”


Sunday, August 4, 2013

What I’m Reading: A Maze of Death


Philip K. Dick begins A Maze of Death with a brief foreword in which he explains that “the theology in this novel is not an analog of any known religion.”  It is an artificial construction based on the arbitrary postulate that God exists. 

That being said, the religion A Maze of Death bears an remarkable similarity to much of Gnostic thought – there is a mutli-modal Deity who created the universe, but whose powers were weakened so that an enemy could arise to confound his creation – known in this novel as The Form Destroyer (which even sounds like it could be a first century Gnostic term.)

A Maze of Death is not an easily read novel.  It’s philosophical science fiction.  It’s Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None with space travel and artificial reality.  It’s the inverse of the Wachowski sibling’s The Matrix. 

The story follows the 14 inhabitants of Delmak-O who have been sent to this colony (?) for reasons unknown.  It is a strange planet (?) devoid of intelligent life except for the gelatinous cube shaped beings that cannot speak, but will answer questions put to them, with anagrams.  The group’s struggle to find meaning in this bizarre place is put in further jeopardy as the members begin to die off one by one.

Much of Dick’s work wrestles with the question of – What is real? What is reality? And A Maze of Death is no exception.   But to say more about that risks giving away spoilers.  Stop here.  You’ve been warned.




It is revealed at the end of the novel that Delmak-O is not a ‘real’ place, but merely an elaborate polyencphalic construction created by the ship’s computer.  So too is the religion which they practice while within this ‘matrix.’  While within this dream world it felt completely real to them, but  upon awakening they recognize it as the artificial construction that it is.

 And they are disappointed.

Unlike Neo, they’d prefer to live within the illusion. “That’s why we created it” says one of the characters.  “Because we wanted it; because we didn’t have it and needed to have it.  Now we’re back to reality … once again we have to face things as they are.  It doesn’t feel too good does it?”



Friday, May 10, 2013

What I’m Reading: Valis



It is one part science-fiction, one part theodicy and two parts Gnostic cosmogony.  Ancient Gnostic Christians are breaking through the illusion of time in order to dethrone the Anti-Christ that is Richard Milhous Nixon.  An orbiting satellite named VALIS (Vast Active Living Intelligence System) is beaming salvific information directly into people’s brains via a pink laser.  King Felix is on the rise.

Reading Valis – the 1981 novel from science fiction author Philip K. Dick – is like reading the secret thoughts of a schizophrenic.  Hallucinations are real.  Reality is itself deranged.  Personalities are split and separated.  Philip Dick himself is a character in the story, as is his schizophrenic other – Horselover Fat (Philip in Greek = “lover of horses,” Dick in German = “Fat”).  And all of it really did happen to him or to them.

In 1974 Philip Dick began to have intense hallucinations, visions, and mystical experiences that he attempted to describe in his writings.  He was living two (or more) lives, seeing visions of Ancient Rome and of an artificial satellite network (VALIS) that is God – or one aspect of God.  He received information from the pink light that helped him save his son from an undiagnosed birth defect.  He had experiences of xenoglossia – speaking a language he’d never learned – specifically Koine Greek, the language of the New Testament.

Although the ancient grey-robed Christians had been slaughtered by the Romans, the cosmic plasmate – the eternal spirit of VALIS had gone into hiding, trapped within the Nag Hamadi texts buried and forgotten in the sands of Egypt.  But, once rediscovered it was loosed again and seeking to share its information.  Real time was suspended in 70 CE with the Roman destruction of Jerusalem.  It resumed again in 1974 CE, but the Empire Never Ended. 

Dick weaves elements of Christianity, Gnosticism, Buddhism, Judaism, Greek Mythology and and and into a franticly complex narrative that makes sense as long as you don’t try to make sense of it.  If you do that it turns into paranoid madness.

The two year old girl, Saint Sophia, has the answers – but she may not be real and she dies.  

Thursday, March 29, 2012

What I’m Reading: Revelations



It’s not a typo and I haven’t mistakenly named the last book of the New Testament in the plural.  The full name of the book I’ve just finished reading is Revelations: Visions, Prophecy and Politics in the Book of Revelation by Elaine Pagels[i].  Pagels is a well respected professor of religion and author of several books focusing on Gnostic texts.  Her latest book is a history of the canonical book of Revelation and of other, Gnostics revelation texts.  In Revelations she shows how John’s Revelation came to its place in the accepted books of the canon and why these other Gnostic works were excluded.

In 1945 a cache of ancient manuscripts was found in Egypt.  These documents have come to be known as the Nag Hamadi texts.  Some of these were “gospels” and some were “books of revelation.”  It is to these that Pagels would like us to turn our attention – but I was really surprised by how little space she devoted to them in the book.

Revelations is not a commentary on the canonical book of Revelation, but out of necessity Pagels does give some comment and an outline of her interpretation of this notoriously difficult book.  Her interpretation surprised me a little; and this surprise surprised me.  I like the book of Revelation.  I’ve read it and re-read it again and again. I’ve read quite a few commentaries on it, both modern and some ancient and I haven’t (yet) encountered any that interpreted it in the way she has.  I guess I haven’t read the right ones yet.

Pagels believes that the writer of the Revelation was a “strictly observant Jew” who was enraged with “Gentile followers of Jesus converted through Paul’s teaching” who had begun to corrupt the synagogues of Asia Minor[ii].   She interprets John’s harsh words against “those who claim to be apostles but are not[iii],” and those “who hold to the teachings of Balaam[iv]” and “those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan[v]” to be these Gentile followers of the Christ who had joined the Jewish community through the teaching of Paul but who did not adhere to the torah.

This is not an interpretation that I’ve encountered before. Again, maybe I’m reading the wrong books.  Pagels seems to have anticipated my rejection of her interpretation.

“But, some readers may ask, when John attacks the ‘synagogue of Satan’ isn’t he talking about actual Jews, that is, members of local synagogues who are hostile to Christians?  When he warns ‘those who way they are Jews and are not,’ doesn’t he mean the opposite of what he says – that they actually are Jews who don’t deserve to be called by that name?”[vi]

She calls this interpretation “convoluted.”

But I disagree.  Or maybe – I accept that it is a “convoluted” argument, but it seems to square with what much of the rest of the New Testament seems to indicate about the state of relationship between the “Jews” and the burgeoning “Christian” community within the established Jewish synagogues.

We find this kind of “convoluted” argument in John’s gospel where Jesus refers to some of his “Jewish” opponents as children of the devil.[vii]  This clash is found throughout Paul’s letters.  In one of them he says that not everyone descended from Israel is actually Israel.[viii]  These are just a couple of references to this same kind of argument.  Why is it convoluted (and wrong) in Revelation, but natural in these other places?

Pagles also suggests that “John” (whoever he might have been, -but certainly not John the Apostle, according to Pagles) wrote in bizarre apocalyptic style as a sort of code in order to hide the meaning from prying Roman eyes because “open hostility to Rome could be dangerous; he may have feared reprisal[ix].”  This is an idea I’ve heard and read before. But it’s not one I’ve ever found very convincing.  If this is a code intended to disguise anti-Imperial propaganda, John failed.  That message is pretty clear – even if the book as a whole is difficult.  I don’t believe that John (whoever he may have been) wrote as he did to –hide- anything; this is a “revelation” after all.  John wrote to reveal not to hide.  But John’s choice of images and allusions are drawn from a deep knowledge of the Jewish scriptures and are used to reveal his message about Jesus, and the things to come.

Pagles seems to believe that history has proven John’s Revelation wrong[x] and that it only has value in a post-modern sort of subjective-true-if-it-works way instead of being grounded in an objective and historical truth.  I won’t defend an “inerrant” definition of biblical inspiration, but if any text (scripture or otherwise) can mean anything then it means nothing. 

In the third chapter, “Other Revelations: Heresy or Illuminations” Pagels gives a very brief overview of some of “revelations” found in the Nag Hamadi texts.  But it’s very brief – barely 30 pages (out of the 180 pages of actual text).  This is the material that I actually expected when I picked up the book at the library. I knew of Pagels’ other writings on Gnostic material and I had hoped to learn a bit more about these other revelations.  Oh well.  I guess I’ll have to hunt them down and read them.

While I disagreed with Pagels through chapters 1 and 2 and was disappointed by chapter 3, I thought chapter 4 “Confronting Persecution: How Jews and Christians Separated Politics from Religion” and chapter 5 “Constantine’s Conversion: How John’s Revelation Became Part of the Bible” were wonderful.

These two chapters are a short history of how the Christian church moved from persecuted minority to the religion of the empire – and how the book of Revelation was variously interpreted for political and ecclesiastical purposes and used against enemies from without and from within the developing Christian church.  This was great material, and I would have been pleased to read more.

As an example- Pagles notes how Tertullian’s interpretation of Revelation led him to an impassioned plea for a secular government that would allow its citizens the freedom to worship according to the dictates of their conscience – a liberate religionis – freedom of religion.  “Those of us who think of human rights and natural rights as concepts born of the French and American revolutions, might be surprised to see this African Christian standing up to defy Scapula, the Roman magistrate stationed in Africa, circa 205 C.E., with these words: ‘It is a fundamental human right, a power bestowed by nature, that each person should worship according to his own convictions, free from compulsion.’”[xi]
In the book’s conclusion Pagles briefly laments that Gnostic voices of revelation were excluded from the canon.  She describes them as “visions that lift their hearers beyond apocalyptic polarities to see the human race a whole…to see each one of us as a whole, having the capacity for both cruelty and compassion.” 

“Living in an increasingly interconnected world, we need such universal visions more than ever.”[xii]

I won’t at this time go into an apologetic defense of ‘orthodox’ (whatever that may be) Christianity against Gnosticism, but I hardly think we need these forgotten ancient voices to bring back Gnostic ideas.  The Gnostic texts may have been suppressed, but their ideas have never really disappeared.  Listen to Oprah, or Osteen, or Chopra if it’s Gnosticism you want.






[i] Pagels, Elaine, Revelations: Visions, Prophecy and Politics in the Book of Revelation,
 Penguin Books, New York, NY, 2012
[ii] Page 54
[iii] Revelation 2:2
[iv] Revelation 2:14
[v] Revelation 2:9
[vi] Page 59- 60 – Italics in the original.
[vii] John 8:44
[viii] Romans 9:6
[ix] Page 30
[x] Page 135
[xi] Pages 131- 2
[xii] Page 176

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

What I’m Reading: The Sacred Journey


I am not what I want to be.
I am not (yet) what I want to be.

The insertion of that three letter word changes everything. That simple three letter word changes the static to the dynamic.  That three letter word transforms the statement from despair into hope.

As I read Charles Foster’s book The Sacred Journey [i] I realized both meanings. 

I want to be holy.  I know that our Father in Heaven has clothed me with the holiness of his beloved and unique son, Jesus, but I am not worthy to wear those clothes. I want to be close to God.  I know that I could do nothing to get to him and that he has, nonetheless, drawn close to me, but I am not always – not often aware of his presence.

I am not what I want to be.

And this may be the existential quandary that has driven innumerable pilgrims of every faith tradition around the world and through the millennia of human history to begin a journey.

I am not (yet) what I want to be.

The implication of that inserted three letter word is that I can – at some point – arrive. If I begin I can move; I can travel. I can be transformed. And at the end of my travels I will arrive. 

We’ll sing in the morning the songs of salvation,
we’ll sing in the noontime the songs of his love,
and when we arrive at the end of our journey
we’ll sing the songs of Zion in the courts above.
[ii]

Foster leads the reader through the stories of the Christian Scripture deftly illustrating that not all who wander are lost.[iii]  From Cain and Able through Jesus and the Apostles the bible is filled with travelers.  

A few weeks ago I asked the question “Why is Jesus always leaving?”  I asked it again a few days later in music.   Foster has an answer for that question. Why is Jesus always leaving? It’s because Jesus is the "God who walks."  He walks among us and with us and sometimes he leads us out into the wilderness, sometimes he leads us up to Jerusalem.  He began his teaching by inviting people to follow him as he walked.
And so I want to make a pilgrimage.  I want to wander.

And as I say that I immediately list all the reasons why that is altogether unfeasible:
            I have responsibilities here.
            I don’t have any vacation time left.
            What about my family?
            Where would I go?  It’s not as if there are any “holy places” or shrines in southern
                        Minnesota.

I know… I know… if it’s really important to me I’ll find a way and everything else is just an excuse. But the questions and the doubt (and the fear) remain.

Foster’s book has got me all stirred up, and I’m not exactly happy about that. If I allow myself to rest in my comfortable sedentary life-as-I-now-know-it I will not know the mystery and wonder of the journey. I will stay, pretty much, as I am.  But having read the book I am compelled to do something with it.  Now that I have heard the word I must heed what it says or I will be one of those double minded fools… I will begin to forget the reflection of myself that I have seen in this book.

I will have to think about this for a while.  A pilgrimage is not just a walk down the road on a sunny afternoon.  And it is not at all a tourist’s vacation.  I will continue to ponder the challenge of this book.  The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.  And, if I am to avoid the curse of Gnosticism[iv], I must incarnate this desire and put my flesh on the road. I cannot think about it for too long. I must get up and go.





Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from the publisher through the BookSneeze®.com book review bloggers program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255 : “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.” 




[i] Foster, Charles, The Sacred Journey, Thomas Nelson Inc, Nashville TN, 2010.
This book is part of the Ancient Practices Series edited by Phyllis Tickle.
[ii] Salvation Army Composer – William Gordon “Salvation’s Song” 
[iii]  J.R.R. Tolkien
[iv] “Physical pilgrimage involves bodies, blisters, hunger and diarrhea.  …It is accordingly one of the best prophylactics against, and cures for, one of the deadliest and most prevalent disease crippling the church: Gnosticism.”  page xvi 



Thursday, April 8, 2010

Scientologists are the New Gnostics



Here is what I have discovered: Scientologists are the new Gnostics.

This isn’t a new discovery; I’m not so brilliant as to have a completely original thought. Others who study theology and religion have already reached the same conclusion.

And in bold fact, Scientologists openly acknowledge the fact.

“Scientology is a Gnostic faith in that it knows it knows.” i

According to Scientology every person is really a Thetan - an infinitely capable and immortal spirit that has become trapped into a physical body and in this physical reality. Through the secret teachings of its founder, L. Ron Hubbard, the Scientologist believes that he or she can learn to escape the confines of this physical universe.

And this is Gnosticism.

Gnosticism was a widely varied system of belief in the ancient near east. It was syncretistic – meaning that it melded together bits and pieces from different philosophies and religious. But one of the unifying thoughts of Gnosticism was that the Gnostic believer would have revealed to them an esoteric knowledge through which the spiritual elements of humanity would be reminded of their true origins within the superior Godhead, being and thus be permitted to escape materiality. ii

Scientology maintains that mankind is basically good. Men are not evil. Women are not evil. Instead, they are just ignorant of their real divinity. We do not need a savior. We do not need a Messiah. According to the Scientologist we need only to awaken to our own potential. We can, they say, save ourselves.

But I know myself well enough to recognize the error there.

I am not “basically good,” or if I am (having been made in the image of a perfectly good creator) then I am, because of my own choices and my own actions, bent towards evil. I cannot dig myself out of this pit that I have dug for myself. I need a Savior.
 
i http://www.basicscientology.com/basic-scientology.htm
ii (Pagels, Elaine. The Gnostic Gospels, Vintage Press, 1989, pgs. 18, 37, 42.)
Jeff Carter's books on Goodreads
Muted Hosannas Muted Hosannas
reviews: 2
ratings: 3 (avg rating 4.33)

Related Posts with Thumbnails